null

Show Entries

Quote
Entered on: June 2, 2003 12:00 AM by The Bone
Quote:
Sausagemania
 
- The Bone
Explanation:
Term used to describe Roche's pre-occupation with male genitalia and his efforts to justify it by suggesting that others share the same hobby. These efforts are usually based on inconclusive supporting evidence that the demented mind of Roche somehow forms into a corroberative point of view.

QUOTE 84 - 7 Comments
From: John Entered on: June 2, 2003 1:42 PM
I have no such preoccupation, only the one conjured up in your mind Bone. Let us examine the evidence a bit more closely starting with Tony's nickname, Bone. A phallic symbol if there ever was one. Tony's obsession with the penis started at a young age manifesting itself in very odd ways. I recall a time he tied a 25 pound weight to it just to see what would happen. In the Bone's youth he would speak of his genitalia frequently. In shower rooms he would make mental notes as to who was packing more than himself. He has admitted to all this in the past, so why are you being so evasive? Are you ashamed? We are all friends here, no need for that.  
Wasn't it you that said you like to see a big cock while watching porn? Oh, sorry, am I mistaken? I think not. So before you go accusing others of offenses you have clearly committed yourself, you should take a close look at your own "sauagemania".  

 
From: The Bone Entered on: June 2, 2003 2:11 PM
Clearly you are excited by all this talk of cranks. Calm yourself down. By the way, your the one who devised the monicker "Bone" and who like to see big cranks in porn.
 
From: John Entered on: June 2, 2003 2:34 PM
To purport you never said you prefer big cranks in porn is mendacious at best. You have said on many occasions that you like to see a hot chick pounded by a big dick as opposed to a small one. The same can be said for me, I just don't think that makes a person a crank gawker is all.  
 
Though it's true I took the T out of T-Bone you have to admitt you like the image it evokes. That is why you refer to yourself as the Bone to this day.
 
From: Ross Entered on: June 2, 2003 2:33 PM
I was just going to bring up the point that John coined "Bone" but I see Bone beat me to it.  
 
However, I would like to make mention of a Bone bone story that I only heard secondhand (from John), and invite the Bone to corroborate or refute it. I seem to recall a conversation we all had way back in our teenage years regarding the durability of the penis. We were saying how sensitive the male testes are but the penis itself was highly durable. John contended that in fact, the penis is quite sensitive, especially when engorged. Now, from here, it's all hearsay but legend has it that The Bone, being the inquisitive sort that he is, decided to put the theory to the test, so one day struck his erect wang with his fist and found, in fact that it hurt like hell.  
 
So how much truth is there to that one?
 
From: The Bone Entered on: June 2, 2003 4:38 PM
I remember this conversation. The scenario (posed by someone other than me, but it rhymes with Roche) was if you were forced by someone to suck his dick at gunpoint or something, then the best thing to do (according to John) would be to feint the sucking and instead deliver a blow to the head of the dong. I posed that the nuggets would be a better target. At some point I did infact punch my own clown for scientific purposes. Although it did hurt, I still maintain a blow to the balls would have been worse.
 
From: Ross Entered on: June 2, 2003 5:22 PM
"Punch my own clown" - HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
 
From: John Entered on: June 5, 2003 10:59 AM
I agree that the nuggets would indeed incapacitate a thug more readily. At the time however I think I suggested starting with a left cross to the head of the dong followed by an uppercut to the jewels. Surely this would deflate the crank and leave even the toughest man reeling in agony.
 

[Log In to Add Comment]


a division of

© 2003 Ross Johnson
RSS Feed