|
Photo
|
|
Entered on: March 20, 2005 12:00 AM by Ross
|
|
|
|
I really can't believe how much attention the marmoset gets here on Jackassery, but I really thought this pic was too good to pass up. This is from a brand new photoshoot from GQ. Will Roche smell the bait and come back to visit?
|
|
PHOTO 180 - 8 Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Fixed 'em for you, Bone). Now what was the point?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
The point is she is pretty much plain to below average without the heavy use of make-up and airbrushing. She warrants no attention yet somehow she gets it on the site. It boggles my mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, speaking as an Alba-agnostic, I went to the site that you got those pics from:
http://members.lycos.nl/tatoo3/jessica-alba/
and noticed that you pretty much picked a couple of the worst ones. Most of them were quite a bit better, and she definitely doesn't look below average. I will grant you that makeup and airbrushing definitely make that picture on the top of this page as great as it is, but that hardly seems like a salient point, as all magazine pictures are guilty of the same, so it kind of levels the playing field.
As for how she gets on the site, it's easy: she stirs up controversy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course I picked the worst ones. They are the truest representation of reality. Sans touch-up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|